Q about plagiarism
|
Your company took over the management of a project for another company that went out of business. To minimize disruptions related to the transition, your company hired a number of the employees from the other company. One of these employees has delivered a 300 page document a week ahead of schedule. However, while walking past his desk you notice he has a document opened on his computer with the logo of his former employer. You suspect that some of his work may have been taken from documentation that is the property of the other company. What do you do?
|


Jgrind07
Sat, 05/11/2013 - 02:24
Permalink
30. A35. BThanksJai
30. A
35. B
Thanks
Jai
sanskrit
Sat, 05/11/2013 - 03:22
Permalink
A an B Respectively
First A
Second B
crushPMP
Sat, 05/11/2013 - 05:50
Permalink
I have a few follow-up
I have a few follow-up questions here, Mr. Scordo has not done an excellent job in clarifying these subtle differences and his answers are contradictory, at time, to his own prior questions - Sometime he says to check with the "guy" (confront), sometimes he say report to management, sometimes he says confirm your own doubts first before blowing the whistle (and your job, ofcourse) and sometimes he say's just stay mum.
So...........
When would you go talk to the "guy" directly (confront him) and check/clarify your doubts before escalating
When would you go top of his head and report your suspision to the Sr. Management (his boss, etc)
When wold you come back to your desk to ascertain your suspicions, before blowing the whiste
Let's say PMI contacts you (a PMP certified Project Manager- AVP) to help investigate a plagiarism case on your reporting manager (also a PMP certified Sr. Project Manager - VP), do you forward all the emails as proofs that your VP was indeed involved in plagiarism or....?
Let's say FBI contacts you (a PMP certified Project Manager- AVP) to help investigate a misdemeanor (felony) charges on your reporting manager (also a PMP certified Sr. Project Manager - VP), do you forward all the emails as proofs that your VP was indeed involved in theft or....?
Appreciate your thoughts on this.
anujairaj
Mon, 05/13/2013 - 13:14
Permalink
When you have evidence, then
When you have evidence, then you notify stakeholders.
In the first case you have evidence that the document was plagiarised as you looked it up and hence you have information to back your case.
In the second case, even though you noticed the document with the logo of another company it is not enough evidence to be presented to the stakeholder as that document was on the guys desktop.So you confront the guy and get more information.
Hope this helps.
cnpatilpmp2012 (not verified)
Sat, 05/11/2013 - 08:25
Permalink
As per me D and B
30. D because, before taking the action of investigation and seeking the copyright approval, you need to stop printing becasue it has already reached the printer and incur any cost of printing you should stop printing. In my opinion, if it was not sent to printer yet, then option A would have been appropriate I guess.
I would like to know the tight answers anway...thanks!
35. B, since none of the other options are not so convincing.
Regards
CN Patil
abdsal
Sun, 05/12/2013 - 16:12
Permalink
Patil , I am joining with
Patil , I am joining with you
30. First stop the work and save additional expenses to print the book. Later we can have investigation and solve the issue by getting copyright.
35. You just "suspected" only. First find whether he has copied the material. Then you can take appropriate action.
crushPMP
Mon, 05/13/2013 - 13:45
Permalink
Correct answers are B and B.
Correct answers are B and B. So I guess, noone really knows when to report, when to investigate, when to complain, when to "do nothing" ...