But as per key it is 8. They provided answer by considering "one" as below. Now, I am confused as which method to be followed. Pls provide the clarification
SS do not have relationship here. Since the task in question having SS do not have any say in getting the succeeding task starting. It is still considering the other task of convergence to decide the start date of the succeedor
If anyone has different way to explain please elt me know.
Well, the diagram shows an SS relation between F and J. There is no lag or lead shown... just plain SS. Meaning that J starts when F starts. That's how we enforce SS/FS/SF/FS relnships, correct? The given SS relation does seem to have a direct bearing on when J starts. Would you agree?
SS means, the succeedor J will not start the activity unless the predecessor F starts regardless when they finish and you are correct there is no lead mentioned. If I'm correct the SS always comes with lead and FS comes always with lag.
In the above network diagram SS doesn't have any type of influence for the calculating the ES for J.
Could you please email me a soft copy of Farndale and also Headfirst questions? (I remember you had mentioned recently to someone on a different thread.) My email is: vericool AT gmail.com
pmpnewster
Sun, 06/09/2013 - 14:10
Permalink
4? 6 ? Regards.
4? 6 ?
Regards.
vmetha
Sun, 06/09/2013 - 15:59
Permalink
7?
A B E so 7?
vmetha
Sun, 06/09/2013 - 15:59
Permalink
7?
A B E so 7?
san
Sun, 06/09/2013 - 17:08
Permalink
Yes, I too got 7 (using zero
Yes, I too got 7 (using zero method)
But as per key it is 8. They provided answer by considering "one" as below. Now, I am confused as which method to be followed. Pls provide the clarification
th9063
Sun, 06/09/2013 - 23:11
Permalink
I got 7 also so what is your
I got 7 also so what is your sosurce of the question
san
Mon, 06/10/2013 - 04:06
Permalink
This question is from
This question is from Farndales
cnppmp
Mon, 06/10/2013 - 10:18
Permalink
Farndales & HeadFirst Lans
Farndales & HeadFirst Lans they use 1 method not 0 method..Which ever you are convenient to sue please follow that, predominantly it's ZERO mehtod..
Regards
CN Patil
DonJuanin
Mon, 06/10/2013 - 16:54
Permalink
ES = EF of previous + 1
ES = EF of previous + 1 using this calculation, answer will be 8.
pmpnewster
Mon, 06/10/2013 - 04:28
Permalink
How did you apply the SS
How did you apply the SS relationship between F and J? Can someone please explain?
Thanks.
Regards.
cnppmp
Mon, 06/10/2013 - 10:16
Permalink
Unnecessarily big network diagram to confuse
It's straight path to J task, so the ES=7.
Regards
CN Patil
pmpnewster
Mon, 06/10/2013 - 13:29
Permalink
The depicted SS relationship
The depicted SS relationship applies to J directly. Does it mean that this SS cannot be enforced...i.e. it is meaningless in this particular diagram??
Can someone please clarify?
cnppmp
Mon, 06/10/2013 - 15:34
Permalink
SS do not have relationship
SS do not have relationship here. Since the task in question having SS do not have any say in getting the succeeding task starting. It is still considering the other task of convergence to decide the start date of the succeedor
If anyone has different way to explain please elt me know.
Regards
CN Patil
pmpnewster
Mon, 06/10/2013 - 15:57
Permalink
Well, the diagram shows an
Well, the diagram shows an SS relation between F and J. There is no lag or lead shown... just plain SS. Meaning that J starts when F starts. That's how we enforce SS/FS/SF/FS relnships, correct? The given SS relation does seem to have a direct bearing on when J starts. Would you agree?
Regards.
cnppmp
Mon, 06/10/2013 - 17:09
Permalink
SS means, the succeedor J
SS means, the succeedor J will not start the activity unless the predecessor F starts regardless when they finish and you are correct there is no lead mentioned. If I'm correct the SS always comes with lead and FS comes always with lag.
In the above network diagram SS doesn't have any type of influence for the calculating the ES for J.
Regards
CN Patil
pmpnewster
Tue, 06/11/2013 - 03:33
Permalink
Hi CNP,Could you please
Hi CNP,
Could you please email me a soft copy of Farndale and also Headfirst questions? (I remember you had mentioned recently to someone on a different thread.) My email is: vericool AT gmail.com
Thank you very much.
Regards.
cnppmp
Tue, 06/11/2013 - 05:08
Permalink
done
done