What do you think on this QS ?

ranatungawk's picture

You know that BAC = 500, PV = 325, AC = 275, and EV = 250 and that you are experiencing typical variances.
What is EAC?

a. 500
b. 250
c. 549.45
d. 525

Since the question mentions typical variances, it would mean that the EAC would be based on CPI, and not adhere to the original plan. Hence the formula I would go with is EAC=(BAC/CPI).

Therefore EAC=(500/(EV/AC))=(500/(250/275))=550. Answer C is closest, but not the same, which should not be the case in this calculation as it does not have decimals (which can be rounded off).

Abhinav Praneet, PMP

Answer C.

For calculations it is best to calculate three decimals, and round them to two.

Then CPI = 250 / 275 = 0,909  --> 0,91

ranatungawk's picture

According to the Rita's book and sevaral other sources :

1. If no variances from the BAC --- > BAC/CPI

2. If variances is Atypical ---> AC + (BAC-EV)

3. IF variances is Typical ---> AC+(BAC-EV)/CPI

 

I think, the 2nd formula should be selected for this ,,,, correct ?

Well not exactly.

IF cost variances had occurred and you expect to keep occurring on the same trend in the future, you have tu use:

EAC = BAC / CPI

If variances occured BUT you don't expect to keep on the futre, you use your second formula EAC = AC + (BAC - EV)

As for the third formula, I think you're referring to this one: EAC = AC + [(BAC - EV) / (SPI*CPI)] which is used for variances to keep on the future and the time constraint is expected to influence the completion of the remaining effort. 

To be honest i don't understand 100% the last one, nor i have been seen it in ANY exercise.

 

The last formula is the same as the first formula. 

EAC = AC + (BAC - EV) / CPI 

When you multiply CPI to AC, it will become EV. This EV will cancel out the EV on the right. The net remaining will be BAC/CPI which is the first formula.

Thanks