Q.2 Oliver Lehmann
Submitted by niteshrs on Tue, 07/12/2011 - 22:35
| 2. | A company has to make a choice between two projects, because the available resources in money and kind are not sufficient to run both at the same time. Each project would take 9 months and would cost $250,000.
Assumed is a discount rate of 5% per year. Looking at the present values of the benefits of these projects in the first 3 years, what is true? |
||||||||||
| Both projects are equally attractive. | |||||||||||
| The first project is more attractive by app. 7%. | |||||||||||
| The second project is more attractive by app. 5%. | |||||||||||
| The first project is more attractive by app. 3%. | |||||||||||
How do we arrive at D as the right choice? Thanks,
Forums:


rishiarien
Wed, 07/13/2011 - 05:41
Permalink
Oliver Lehmann
Second project NPV
= 15000 / (1.05) + 125000/ sq (1.05) + 220000/ Cu (1.05)
= 14285.714 + 113378.685 + 190044.272
= 317708.67
First Project NPV
= 120000/ 1.05 + 120000/ sq (1.05) + 120000/ Cu (1.05)
=114285.71 + 108843.54 + 103660.51
= 326789.76
To calculate percent
(326789.76 - 317708.67) x 100 / 326789.76
= approx 3%
I hope such questions will not turn up in PMP else we would have to spend 5 minutes solving this question itself.
aaron
Wed, 07/13/2011 - 20:48
Permalink
This question should not turn
This question should not turn up on the exam. These are CFA Level 1 type of questions
rsang
Wed, 07/13/2011 - 06:14
Permalink
Answer
I will try like this:
Calculate PV for 3 years @ 5% discount rate:- (PV = FV / (1 + rate)^n)
Project 1) cost reduction=profit (I assumed)
120000 + 114286 + 108844 = 343130
Project 2)
15000 + 119048 + 199546 = 333594
Now we can conclude that "first project is more attractive"
now, 343130 - 333594 = 9536, which is approx 3 more.
And , even I doubt if such calculation questions will come for exam.